Your Family History and Royal Descent

So, why did you start researching your ancestry?of the people living 20-30 generations ago had
Have you always been a history buff? A lot ofdescendants survive. Of course the odds of
people start off their research just curious aboutsomeone having surviving descendants were
their great grandparents and those that camemuch better if the person in question was tied to
before them. Many people have conjuredroyal families.
romantic images of Presidents, Kings, Princes,What's the population of the world today? Around
Queens, Knights and other notables in the distant7 billion. So when we look 20 generations or so
past. There is a joke about some people thatback in time we see around 500 years give or
claim their family are direct descendants oftake (assuming a shade over 25 years per
George Washington. The real joke here is thatgeneration, of course this can vary wildly.) So
George Washington had no direct descendants.around the year 1500 what was the worlds
(Nephews, nieces and cousins are a completelyestimated population? It's estimated that there
different story.)were 450 Million people alive in the year 1500.
Let me give you something for you to chew onWhat's really interesting here is that it only takes
for a while: we are all descended from royalty.a total of 30 generations back to be researching 1
What is that you say? You haven't received theBILLION ancestors and that's just taking us back
family greeting cards from Her Majesty? Well, letto around the year 1250. This is approximately
me tell you how I've come to that conclusionthe time of Edward the First King of England. (To
after many years of research and countlesswhom I've found more purported links in my
times having stumbled across supposed "gatewayresearch than I can count.)
ancestors" and a little bit of math. To start let'sNow, in my own research and research of my
look at just pure math.wifes' family it seems that for each of our
One person has two parents, that's the way it'sgrandparents family tree there is at least one
been so we can assume that for each generationso-called gateway ancestor that has been
we trace backwards we will double the number ofthoroughly researched and is a connection or
people we're researching. So, after 4 generations"gateway" into medieval genealogy. More often
back we're researching 16 people (2nd greatthan not, these gateway ancestors trace their
grandparents.) Now, by the time we research 10way into royal families due to the notorious
generations into the past we now have 1024interconnections between royals and nobility in
people to research. (Even if our chart isn'twestern Europe. Now, are you not of western
completely "filled in" at that level that's how manydescent? Even those that don't have a drop of
blank spaces there should be if you assumeWestern European blood likely are descendants of
there's no duplication.) Some families of courseother royals in their culture. In any case proving it
have more duplication than others this all dependsis the trick.
on how isolated the area your ancestors livedWhen you think through the math of it all, it's
was, or coincidence, or even customs of thehard to escape that we are all descendants of
time, but assuming no duplicate ancestors weroyalty. I doubt many of us will be invited over to
have the arduous task or researching 1,048,576tea at Her Majesty's' winter palace, but when you
different ancestors by the time we get back 20read history and the story of our fallible ancestors
generations. Those are our 18th greatremember they, in many ways are the same as
grandparents. It only takes going back a total ofyou. Before I finish, let me point out that we're
30 generations for us to pass 1 billion. Yes, 1also descendants of hundreds of thousands of
BILLION! Since the world population has justnameless faceless peasants that worked and
passed a billion people for the first time in the lasttoiled hard in obscurity as well. We would do well
century (the 1900s) you can be sure there isto keep in mind all of our ancestry.
some duplication. Let me point out though, not all