Language Diversity in US History

Historical accounts provide insight into possibleIn the Second Federalist Paper, John Jay wrote
reasons for particular attitudes toward languagethis often-quoted statement: "Providence has
diversity in the United States. Researchers suchbeen pleased to give this one connected country
as Heinz Kloss and Marc Schell paint a picture ofto our united people-a people descended from the
polyglotism during U.S. history. From pre-Colonialsame ancestors, speaking the same language,
times to the dawn of the Republic, there wereprofessing the same religion, attached to the
fewer English speakers than is generally assumed.same principles of government...." The same
Among the inhabitants in the precolonial andlanguage was assumed to be English. Inexplicably,
colonial eras and at the birth of the United StatesJay overlooked the many speakers of other
were many speakers of German and of aboriginallanguages living in and around the colonies.
and African languages.The ambivalence that Schmid notes among the
Outside of the colonies, there were also speakersfounders has persisted throughout U.S. history and
of French and Spanish. Carol Schmid asserts thathas shaped attitudes toward language variation.
the founding fathers probably considered languageThe struggle between the notion that foreigners
an individual matter and did not consider diversityare an asset to society or, alternatively, a threat
to be a problem to the degree it is seen to bewhen they attempt to preserve their language
today. Newcomers could use a heritage languageand cultural heritage continues to this day.
as long as they did not intend to retain theThis ambivalence and the consequent
language for a long time. Politically significantdialectic-rather than language diversity in itself-is at
groups, such as the Germans, werethe core of associated dissension and social
accommodated in exchange for their loyalty todivision that has been feared throughout U.S.
the cause of independence.history, when newcomers arrive in large numbers
In the revolutionary era, federal documents wereand preserve their language and culture in the
published in English and in other languages. Schmidnew land. Both have been played out on
further points out that the new U.S. Constitutionnumerous occasions in many public settings
was completely silent on the subject of officialincluding schools and the workplace, and in the
language and language diversity. Though themedia.
English and their descendants constituted less thanAlthough difficult to prove, it may well be that the
half of the population at the time of the firstfears connected with language and cultural
census, Schmid notes that James Madison madediversity are what creates problems in the
no reference at all to language, culture, orsociety, rather than diversity itself.
ethnicity in his essays about diversity.