How to Break a Family History Brick Wall

If you are having problems researching yourboth the first name and the second had not been
family tree then maybe you can learn somethingwritten down by the person in question, as they
from my experience here. I had got nowheremay well have been illiterate. When you come to
with this ancestor's birth, marriage or death - ondo your own research you should bear in mind
or off-line - then a chance visit to a Family Historythis point. The vicar could have misinterpreted the
Website and an hour or two looking at thename writing it as he had heard it spoken to him
transcripts and a brick wall in my family historyand so that "Sissell" could possibly been "Cecil" or
research came tumbling down! This, together withsomething completely different. As for Sunass -
thinking of spelling variations of names, opened upat that time I was clueless as to what it could
a new line to me.have been!
My paternal line in Dartmouth, Devon, UK hasThere were no early enough christening records
always been a bit frustrating once the censusfor John and Elizabeth on the Dartmouth Archives
records ran out in 1841. This, of course, is thewebsite, but I opened another browser and
earliest census available on-line for England so thatnavigated to the Latter Day Saints (LDS) website
after this I needed to begin looking at parishor FamilySearch.org and here I did a search for
records. I had worked out that my three timesElizabeth's christening and was lead to a baptism in
great-grandfather was called John Thorn and fromone of the other churches in Dartmouth, St
the information given in the census collections IPetrox, on the 16 September 1878. The daughter
knew that he had been born in about 1795 and hisof James and Sarah Sissill was one Elizabeth
wife, Elizabeth, in about 1798.Gardener Sissill - and here I noted that the spelling
As a member of The Society of Genealogists inhad changed to Sissill with an "i" and not an "e".
Goswell Road, London EC1. I was aware that theThis record made me wonder if the witness to
SoG has the biggest collection of Parish RecordsElizabeth's marriage could have been her father
in Britain on microfiche. They've also got some"James" and this has been interpreted as "Sunnas"
transcripts of parish registers in the library.because a flowing "J" for James had looked like an
Unfortunately Dartmouth parish records were not"S" and the other letters had been misread as a
microfilmed, but a selection of Devon Family"u" for an "a" and the double "n" as an "m".
History Society booklets of the marriages ofThe point I'm making here is to watch out for
some of the churches in the town, including St.names and their spelling. Before the levels of
Saviour's, were available. Scanning one book forliteracy rose amongst the general public, our
any likely ancestors I noted down that on 13 Aprilforebears would rely very heavily on a vicar
1817 a John Thorn married an Elizabeth Sissell.writing down their given names as they sounded
With this tentative lead, I hit the Internet. I wasto him.
looking for any evidence that this was theThis success was because I located Dartmouth's
marriage of my ancestors. I opened thehistory website and then used their resources in
Dartmouth-history.org.uk website belonging to Theconjunction with other Internet sites, such as the
Dartmouth Archives and realising that thisfamilysearch.org. I could then take the names and
voluntary history group had an extremely gooddetails further by looking for death certificates for
family history section including transcribedJohn Branton Thorn and his wife Elizabeth
baptisms, burials, marriages and census records. IGardener Thorn, as they had died after civil
could read the very same details, as I had seen inregistration of deaths took place in 1837. From
London, on this niche site. The information beganhere a physical visit to the Devon Record Office
in 1586 and ran to 1850! There was the marriageto see the parish records may be the next step.
of John to Elizabeth and this time I noticed thatThe first lesson is that you should always look to
the witness were given as John Adams andsee what other research may have been done,
Sunass (sic) Sissell. I made the assumption thatfor the area your ancestors came from, and that
this particular person was part of the bride'sis published on the Internet. Should you come
family and may have been her father, but still theacross a family history society, or local history
name Sunass gave me great concern as it simplygroup with an internet site, could any of their
didn't seem right and I thought that possibly itpublications or website pages be of any use to
wasn't legible to the transcriber.you in your research? Secondly, be aware of the
After doing family history for a few years now,misspelling of names and keep your mind open to
I'm aware that names can be transcribedpossibilities. In my case I need to think of other
incorrectly. Perhaps written down as thespellings for the Sissells or names that may have
transcriber had seen them (as best practicesounded like Sissell in order that I may trace this
dictates) and not changed to conveniently fit inline back further and break down the brick wall.
with what is consider to be correct. I wondered if