Genealogy and Family History Research - Verifying Your Information

While you are out there trying to do research onthat there were actually two Ralph Allens in
your family genealogy, you need to keep in mindSandwich for a number of years, and it was also
one very important thing. There is a LOT ofapparent that both of them were in some way a
misinformation out there, especially in this time ofpart of this family. In the Plymouth Colony
the internet where information flows faster thanrecords there is mention of a Ralph Jr. and a
we can possibly keep up with it.Ralph Sr. But there was no indication that Ralph
Most people begin their search by starting ahad named any of his children after himself.
family tree online at places like Ancestry or OneBut if this was the case, then which Ralph Allen
Great Family. These are wonderful sources ofwas my direct ancestor, the father of Jedediah?
information, and the larger they get the moreAnd which was the son of the George I had
likely it is that you can hook onto someone else'sspent so much time researching? After another
tree and all of a sudden discover dozens oftwo weeks of intensive research I finally had to
ancestors you didn't know of before. But, and thiscome to the conclusion that MY Ralph was the
is a big but, you cannot accept all of this asone called Ralph Jr. and that he was NOT the son
absolute truth. Any family tree that goes back farof George. How disappointing! And the sad thing is,
enough is going to have errors, some of themthere is no way to quickly spread this information
quite serious ones, and sites like Ancestry are notto other people who have the Allens in their trees.
responsible for making sure the information that isPeople will still find the old sources that are wrong.
shared is accurate. That is your responsibility.I know my Ralph is connected to this family
A lot of people get their information from oldsomehow, I just don't know how, and I don't
manuscripts and books that are now out ofthink I'm ever going to.
copyright and being made available on the internet.Other mistakes are quite prevalent as well. If you
These people did their research at a time when ituse sites that allow you to add other family trees
was extremely hard to do. They had to go toto your own, you really should at least skim over
the source records, or spend months and eventhe people who come into your tree. I constantly
years corresponding with someone who hadfind people who had children well after their own
access to them. They did not have thedeaths, or when they were eight years old. I
advantage of the mountains of information we dofound one account on a website, written up as a
today. So we can forgive them if they got somestory, so you know the person had to have done
things wrong, which they did. But it still presents aat least SOME research. In this account they
problem for us today, because their erroneousmentioned the year of death, But two sentences
conclusions are now available to thousands oflater they stated that the person was imprisoned
people through the magic of the internet. Peopletwo years afterward for having "Quaker leanings."
reading this material think they are readingIn working with the Pilgrim era like I do I find that
accurate information, and they add that to theirmany people list birthplaces as being the same
trees, and the bad information gets spreadplace as somewhere they know their ancestor
around. This is why it is always necessary to golived. But people were not born in Massachusetts
to the source records and verify things forin 1598, unless they were Native Americans. The
yourself.Pilgrims didn't arrive until 1620.
Let me give you a recent example I just wentAll of this illustrates how very important it is to
through myself. I had traced my ancestry backverify all your information however you can from
to a Jedediah Allen, who was born in Sandwich,primary sources. Town and church records are
Massachusetts in 1646. All of the information Iexcellent for this. If your ancestors were
was finding indicated he was the son of a RalphQuakers, they were probably mentioned in
Allen, born in 1615 in England, and the grandson ofmeeting records somewhere. Much of this source
a George Allen, born in 1568, and who emigratedmaterial is now available on the internet, and
from England to the colonies in 1635. I had copiesespecially sites like Ancestry, where you can
of a number of manuscripts and family historiessearch through literally tens of thousands of
written so long ago as to be out of copyright,records for a nominal monthly fee. Sorting out the
plus all the trees on Ancestry had it that way.Ralph Allens could only be done by comparing
So I spent about three weeks happily gathering allnumerous records, and making logical deductions
the information I could on the Allen family, andfrom them. Without doing this, I would have
there were a lot of them. George had at least 10accepted a false family history. What's the point
children, and it seemed like Ralph had even more.of doing your genealogy if you don't care be sure
However, as I went along it became apparentof its accuracy?